While some folks claim that experienced workers are constructive to an institution, i believe that the teenager apprentices devote more; thus, these younger attendants are more instrumental to an organisation. This essay will first discuss on why mature employees remain pivotal and secondly, the two logical explanations about the roles of immature associates in a team with relevant examples.
On the one hand, the proponents of veteran clerks insist that hiring seasoned labourers can save the company's resources because the majority of management normally drain the budget for drilling inexperienced helpers, who usually are required to train for a prolonged time, and hence remain the leading roots of shortage of investment funds in a club. Next, proven experience is one of the most positive facets of laying number one emphasis to an accomplished helper, which means that the worker is already keenly acquainted with the technicalities and disciplines of a work place. Not only would experiences prevent him from committing fatal blunders, which oftentimes become fairly common among growing adults, but also an individual would carry out tasks precisely and perfectly.
On the other hand, i strongly believe that the youngsters are more potent than the old ones for the research has revealed that the youths are considerably passionate to works. As they are generally much active and vigorous to the task, many working persons tend to enjoy the atmosphere that could subsequently subject to a total dedication and inspiring performance from juveniles. Secondly, it is highly convenient to manage them as opposed to seniors since their expectations naturally seem low, so they are very flexible and they would be ready to stretch hands to contribute when the manager needs extra working hours. In addition, directors can invest low budget to these immature employees compared to experienced candidates. Owing to the recession these days, many of them suffer from serious troubles. Therefore, everyone is bound to stay in a platform, which could assist them to pursue a glittering career in the course of time. It ascertains why junior helpers would be strongly preferred over aged characters.
In conclusion, presumably, because of immense enthusiasms and low costs, elderly applicants are frequently overlooked in an occupation.
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
wrong: 'i believe that the teenager apprentices devote more;'
here 'younger' means that the age in the company is less compared to an employee who came earlier with more work experiences. it is not about a real age.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 364 350
No. of Characters: 1937 1500
No. of Different Words: 238 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.368 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.321 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.87 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 147 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.8 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.307 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.53 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ers are constructive to an institution, i believe that the teenager apprentices d...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4478021978 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93068265034 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651098901099 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.7415644589 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.538461538 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107269380248 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334978169292 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459917674078 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063899724914 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712673688539 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.