Topic: Some people believe that mature employees are beneficial to a company. Others think that younger employees contribute more and hence are more beneficial to a company. Discuss both views with your own perception.

Essay topics:

Topic: Some people believe that mature employees are beneficial to a company. Others think that younger employees contribute more and hence are more beneficial to a company. Discuss both views with your own perception.

While some folks claim that experienced workers are constructive to an institution, i believe that the young professionals devote more; thus, these forces are more instrumental to an organisation. This essay will first discuss on why mature employees remain pivotal and secondly, the two logical explanations about the roles of immature associates in a team with relevant examples.

On the one hand, the proponents of veteran clerks insist that hiring seasoned labourers can save the company's resources because the majority of management normally drain the budget for drilling inexperienced helper...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ers are constructive to an institution, i believe that the young professionals de...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41144414169 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9307884681 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656675749319 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.1049728202 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.769230769 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2307692308 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100338624491 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317949174229 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042511539582 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597739050273 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647644950978 0.056905535591 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

This essay will first discuss on why mature employees remain pivotal and secondly, the two logical explanations about the roles of immature associates in a team with relevant examples.
This essay will discuss on firstly why mature employees remain pivotal, and secondly, the two logical explanations about the roles of immature associates in a team with relevant examples. //to be parallel

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 367 350
No. of Characters: 1939 1500
No. of Different Words: 240 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.377 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.283 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.874 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 141 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 110 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.231 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.716 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.308 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.529 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.109 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5