It is argued that tutors will be replaced soon with the artificial intelligence in the classroom. I am not agree with that as for children human contact is needed to feel them safe and there are many alternative has done with face to face teaching such as by providing computers.
Firstly, in the field of education of youngsters there is human touch needed to feel them secure and safe. Furthermore, the understanding and compassion cannot be provided by machines no matter how intellegent they are. For example, teachers knows how to cope up with kids who are weak in some activities as they are also parents. For machines I do not think that they can do so as machines do whatever we had stored and commanded on it.
Moreover, nowadays there are many facilties are provided tk tutors for face to face technology. As there are computers and educlasses on which they help youngsters to visualise of things easily in which they face problems. Online computer systems can help teachers updating all new findings and passing that knowledge to the students. In addition to , it do not limit the learning of children only in the classrooms but after class as well. For instance, most of the schools encouraging children to use ipods on which youngsters can watch classes with the help of internet on whichever topic they want and wherever they are.
To conclude, use of artificial intelligence is increasing in other sectors and giving benefits but in education tutors are more beneficial than automation as they wil easily get access with childrens and help them in upcoming life as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at tutors will be replaced soon with the artificial intelligence in the classroom...
^^
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...intelligence in the classroom. I am not agree with that as for children human contact...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun alternative seems to be countable; consider using: 'many alternatives'.
Suggestion: many alternatives
... needed to feel them safe and there are many alternative has done with face to face teaching suc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'alternatives'?
Suggestion: alternatives
...ed to feel them safe and there are many alternative has done with face to face teaching suc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot think that they can do so as machines do whatever we had stored and commanded ...
^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nowledge to the students. In addition to , it do not limit the learning of childre...
^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...ge to the students. In addition to , it do not limit the learning of children only...
^^
Line 5, column 529, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hildren to use ipods on which youngsters can watch classes with the help of inter...
^^
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nternet on whichever topic they want and wherever they are. To conclude, use ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88191881919 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73335389362 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542435424354 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3668940553 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236671884662 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090002300962 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943053491333 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160264388532 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135982101368 0.056905535591 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.