The assessments of the student’s learning outcomes are the main way to collect their progress in educational courses. It is said that students’ ability should be assessed basing on their performance on a test at the end of course. To what extend, do you agree or disagree with the statement?
It is true that the assessments of students’ learning outcomes play a vital role in students’ lives. To a certain extent I agree that professors should assess students’ abilities base on their results in a test at the end of course; however, I also believe that professors could determine students’s abilities through some aspects.
On the one hand, I think that assessing students’s capabilities basing on their final results is acceptable. To use a common example of this practice, many students at university nowadays, especially senior, have to do some part-time jobs to make ends meet since cost of living in a big city is quite high. Moreover, evaluating through students’ final results not only require them to prepare carefully for final exam, but also help them take their responsibilities for studying. The students can pass the exam easily if they pay high attention to revising all lessons. By contrast, high tuition must be taken into account if students fail the exam and are willing to continue to study.
On the other hand, professors might evaluate their students’ abilities base on some aspects. Firstly, I think that class participation should be considered. Professors could assess students’ understanding by asking them some questions related to recent lessons. For instance, when students speak up in class, they learn to express their ideas in a way that others can understand. Secondly, students’ abilities could be assessed basing on their monthly presentation. A wide range of skills such as team-work, communication, problem-solving or personal skills are represented in front of class, helping professors have right evaluation with accurate score.
In conclusion, I think that students’ ability should be determined basing on not only performance on a test at the end of course, but also class participation and monthly presentation as well.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, of course, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52525252525 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36231660341 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0692307219 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.214285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474283985658 0.244688304435 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187771567164 0.084324248473 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128652409807 0.0667982634062 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.332575833362 0.151304729494 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930290075372 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.