The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Experts throughout both the developing and developed world have debated whether people will becoming increasingly healthy or not in the future. Alongside the arguments from both sides, the latest sociological discoveries have casted light based on the implication of technology and globalization. This essay will assert that the general health standard will be higher, using the examples from World Health Organisation (WHO).
To begin with, globalisation is intuitively perceived as an impediment for arousing public awareness on health. This is largely because this international change presents us an opportunity to compare the culture entailing eating habit, work-life balance and pressure control among nations. For example, the western population would have enjoyed a life expectancy that are comparable to their eastern counterparts if their governments had been aware of the distinctive components in the Asian daily meals. Consistent with this line of thinking, according to the WHO, vegetarian delicacies have been widely advocated in European countries over the part decades. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that globalisation fosters the well-being of the public.
Another plausible explanation that should not be neglected behind this prognostication is the fact that the recent emergence of technological inventions increase the likelihood of adopting a healthy life-style. The central reason behind this is twofold, firstly the personal wearables such as smart-watches and smart-glasses ensure a real time monitoring to our biological measurement. Secondly, the utilisation of various automation encompassing search engines and quality control empowers our productivity, which in turn, to a considerable extent, alleviate our strain from both business and academic tasks. In fact, recent empirical research from the WHO ascertained that the employment of robotics in construction sites is not only capable to save time for workers, but also effectively preclude workers from injuries and respiratory diseases. Consequently, it is possible to state beyond doubt that technology constitutes a positive driver for public health.
In conclusion, there is ample evidence suggesting the notion that the general public will get more healthy in the coming years, attributing to the ongoing globalisation and persistent deployment of technology in our daily lives. It is predicted that the global life expectancy will climb to 100 years in the foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-02 | A92 | 100 | view |
| 2019-02-06 | ross_diadame | 92 | view |
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?Give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience. 89
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
- Space exploration requires vast sums of money. Is the amount of money spent on space research justifiable? Could the money be better spent?What is your viewpoint on this issue? Give reasons for your answer. 89
- Traditional classrooms in the past held lectures with multiple participants Now that technology makes it easier and faster for students to access information the need for traditional classroom discussion is becoming less popular It s because the internet 96
- The table below shows the number of medals won by the top ten countries in the London 2012 Olympic Games. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
... world have debated whether people will becoming increasingly healthy or not in the futu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...evidence suggesting the notion that the general public will get more healthy in the coming yea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85359116022 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19154993144 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627071823204 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0746641521 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.266666667 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1333333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125978929645 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403844778763 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348896209306 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669934927662 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397504040731 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.