The best way to deal with the rising problem of traffic and transportation is to encourage people to live in cities rather than in the suburbs or in the countryside. To what extent do you agree?
Public concern has arisen about whether traffic issues can be addressed by assembling people in cities to reduce to pressure on transportation system or not. From my perspective, I am in favour of the latter opinion due to several reasons.
The primary factor we need to take into consideration is that this solution may lead to unexpected problems. More specifically, living in different parts of the country provides residents with a suitable system of infrastructure such as supermarkets, schools and hospitals. Therefore, more inhabitants in one area means that the government need to meet the demands of new residents by improving the city amenities, which results in a lack of national budget.
In the second place, opposed to what people believe, dense population in cities has led to the more serious problems in traffic owing to the sudden growth in city population. Therefore, the pressure on city traffic would increase dramatically whereas the facilities in rural areas would be wasted.
It may be tempting to argue that we can now upgrade the traffic system in cities only and hence, it saves time and efforts to solve these problems in every parts of the nation. However, further analysis would make it clear that most of the trouble arising in transportation takes place in cities and assembling people there just increase these issues.
All things considered, I firmly believe that encouraging people to living in cities cannot solve traffic problems but turn them into more serious ones. In contrast, it is generally advisable that rising the population in rural areas may lead to a great result.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, whereas, in contrast, such as, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15909090909 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84407903953 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1203665089 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.818181818 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204612178556 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727358327645 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583939929932 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114227540703 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437320060899 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.