The best way of motivating workers or encourage employees to improve their performance is to pay them according to the amount of sales or products they produces. Do you agree or disagree? What other ways would you suggest?
Employers now a days practice numerous practices to enhance workers efficiency at workplaces. However, it is largely considered that the most effective method to develop motivation among workers to enhance their productivity is to co-relate their wages with their professional output. As far as I am concerned, I personally feel that linking their monetary benefits to their performance is a key to improve productivity, but one cannot overlook the importance of healthy and fresh mindset at work.
Giving assurance to the staff members that their positive efforts and dedication to their work would be acknowledged and rewarded monetarily, output could be increased considerably. For instance, if salary of a retail store manager is associated with gross monthly sales of the store, he/she would certainly make an honest effort to maximize the sales.
As we are talking about the workers dedication and concentration at workplace to achieve more production targets or to be more efficient, the importance of healthy and fresh mental approach cannot be ignored. Member of an organization can be stressed at times due to their professional or personal issues, leading them to perform poorly. A solution this problem is to arrange mental health counseling sessions regularly coupled with motivational speaker seminars. Some organizations even have gyms and mini cinemas at workplaces to keep people at work motivated and fresh.
Hence, by considering the aforementioned arguments, we can reach the conclusion that linking financial benefits of workers to their professional output can trigger the key-performing-indicators in an upward direction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
Employers now a days practice numerous practices to enhance ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of healthy and fresh mindset at work. Giving assurance to the staff members th...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n honest effort to maximize the sales. As we are talking about the workers dedi...
^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
... sales. As we are talking about the workers dedication and concentration at workpla...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ep people at work motivated and fresh. Hence, by considering the aforementioned...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, so, for instance, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.624 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33307305651 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.6320982764 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.6 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135221555659 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053873084828 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.02981645597 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806971681411 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280883100499 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.