The best way to reduce youth crime is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent you agree or disagree.
Juvenile delinquency constitutes the first and foremost step of preventing full-fledged criminals. Methodology of fighting against youth crime is disputable. It is argued that education of parents is the optimum way of tackling with juvenile crimes. I am strongly favor in this idea that well-educated parents may prevent youngster crimes better than any official department.
On the one hand, childhood’s trauma which can be controlled by parents is the most prominent cause of antisocial behaviours which may turn to crime by the times. Childhood mainly shaped by criminal’s relatives. If governments pay attention about the role of family and educates fathers and mothers about the root of the crime, parents will hinder the majority of the offence which are committed by youngster. For instance, in Scothland, youth crime rates has decreased after parents took a briefing by officers and they started to patrolling in the streets after sunset to warrant and sent young people to their home earlier. Thus, education and participation of family could prevent many offences.
Secondly, parents know their children who have tendency through crime better than others so that they can cooperate with police to put off new crimes. Children may commit some insignificant crimes such as shoplifting, mugging before serious crimes like murdering. If parents call police about children’s unaccepted behaviours, they could cope against crime together. For example, according to the police reports, mass murdering attacks were prevented by the calling of family members before the attack happened. Therefore, cooperation of family is vital during fight against crime.
To sum up, it is stated that the gain of parental skills by educating families is the best way tackling with youth crimes. I support this argument as parents know their children best and may cooperate with police centers before a crime is committed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting full-fledged criminals. Methodology of fighting against youth crime is dispu...
^^
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'favored'.
Suggestion: favored
...ing with juvenile crimes. I am strongly favor in this idea that well-educated parents...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in this idea that well-educated parents may prevent youngster crimes better tha...
^^
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that well-educated parents may prevent youngster crimes better than any officia...
^^
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent cause of antisocial behaviours which may turn to crime by the times. Childhoo...
^^
Line 4, column 643, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oung people to their home earlier. Thus, education and participation of family co...
^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cant crimes such as shoplifting, mugging before serious crimes like murdering. If...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51006711409 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91014481434 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7424857217 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.625 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315764243787 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108698414804 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844539778459 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224660031659 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802600081444 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.