The best way to resolve the world environmetal problems is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree ?
Obviously, the environment pollution is now on an alarm condition, especially contamination caused by the enormous consumption of fossil fuel every single day owns up the considerable factor. As a result, an ideal of boosting the value of fuel may be taken into consideration to dwindle the pollution scale. I will try to throw light upon this declaration as well as I will try to posit my perspective about it.
To begin with, there are multifarious reasons that shore those people who believe increasing the fuel price a solution. Initiatively, high cost of it might force the users to give up on it. To explain, when fossil fuel turns into a too precious thing to achieve, people are deemed finding other kinds of energy sources to replace since it is challenging to make and meets nowadays, people have much expenses to handle but their budgets are not limitless. And hence, it does not only lead to the consequence of less fossil energy consumed but also open the new chapter of clean energy. Apparently, eternal sources, for instance, solar power, wind, water power are definitely cheaper in comparison with fossil power, finally this could result in the impetus of clean fuel, help more users get accessed to the new fuel era. Additionally, the surge of fuel costs can make people to switch over the use of private vehicle to the public one, which means less carbon footprint.
On the other hand, the completely transition of this development might create a series of breeze. And just a little consensus may be showed up. Of course, because fossil fuel is the mainstay of a range of businesses, if this prospect does happen, it will bring the subsistence of these companies to the brink of ebb. Probing further, eternal power can't be easily approached all over the world, so it can't meet the world's requirement.
Conclusively, there are merits and demerits among the trend. However, I pertinaciously believe that, in the long run, the advantages may far outweight the drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...up the considerable factor. As a result, an ideal of boosting the value of fuel m...
^^
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fuel may be taken into consideration to dwindle the pollution scale. I will try ...
^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'making'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: making
...rces to replace since it is challenging to make and meets nowadays, people have much ex...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...to make and meets nowadays, people have much expenses to handle but their budgets ar...
^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... of ebb. Probing further, eternal power cant be easily approached all over the world...
^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ly approached all over the world, so it cant meet the worlds requirement. Conclu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...ly approached all over the world, so it cant meet the worlds requirement. Conclu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...all over the world, so it cant meet the worlds requirement. Conclusively, there ar...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, finally, hence, however, if, may, so, well, for instance, of course, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9375 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76981977268 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7926045223 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.6 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101283817104 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297715815815 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283253227768 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0471615967415 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033879075796 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.