The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in European country from 2005 to 2008.
he
The graph depicts the proportion of trash disposal during the period of 3 years starting from 2005 to 2008 of a Western country in three methods: landfill, burning, dumping in sea.
At the first glance, in terms of junkyard way of disposal, it took over the largest amount at the early stage, the greatest number during a time frame,whereas the burning one has always stood at the bottom of the list.
It's obvious from the graph that dumping waste under the earth shows a
dramatic fluctuation. The significant decreasement was indicated from the chart
with the enormous number at the beginning, around 2000 million tones, fell considerably to 1100 million tones at the end of the period.
In contrast to landfill, the choice of sinking garbage in sea illustrates a gradually increase during the interval of 3 years with the disparity of nearly 450 million
tones in comparison between 2008 and 2005.
Unlike the two above surging and reducing trends, burning solution does not display any critical changes. The digit was plummeting and ending at less than 900 million tones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he The graph depicts the proport...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
he The graph depicts the proportion of tras...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 151, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , whereas
... the greatest number during a time frame,whereas the burning one has always stood at the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 18, column 75, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...e of sinking garbage in sea illustrates a gradually increase during the interval of 3 years with the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, whereas, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18232044199 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60478342208 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635359116022 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7571966934 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 3.83414634146 209% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175856810117 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823976961156 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10159502879 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913286431275 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108449763464 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.