The chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant.You should write at least 150 words.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant.

You should write at least 150 words.

The bar chart given illustrates the information about the quantity of garbage waste in a country of Europe treated by three various methods, namely landfill, burning and dumping at the sea over the course of 3 years from 2005 to 2008.
Overall the landfill witnessed a downward tendency whereas there was a gradual increase in the figure for the other treatments.
In 2005, burying rubbish was the most popular usage, about 1800 million tones, tripling as popular as dumping at sea, around 600 million tones. One year later, the total trash material buried declined sharply, approximately 1200 million tones. From that time to 2008, less garbage was disposed of using this treatment than before, dropping gradually by 10 million tones annually. Meanwhile, the number of dumping in the ocean fluctuated over four-years period, falling slightly from 600 to over 500 million tones.
By contrast, incineration was the least favourite method to deal with waste in 2005, recording about 45 million tones. Each over the next 3 years, the moderate rise in 100 million tones of using the heat. Subsequently, this number of 2008 continued to go up and hit a peak at 900 million tones rubbish waste by using this treatment.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05970149254 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55673960407 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616915422886 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5252693043 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124210441188 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052808328942 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542695403981 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797874238059 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613426879346 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.