The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some individuals believe that raising cost of fuel is the most effective way to solve world’s environmental problems, while I accept that this policy is good to some extents, but I believe it is not the best method because there are much better measure to reduce environmental issues.
It might be a good idea to increase the price of fuel such as coal, petrol and gas because of some reasons. Firstly, by making it more costly to purchase fuel, government can deter people from using personal vehicles. For example, if gasoline is more expensive, people will start using public transport rather than driving a car or riding a motorbike, resulting in a reduction of CO2 emissions, which is responsible for global warming and climate change. Secondly, the decrease in the demand of fuel as a result of high price would lead to the minimization of natural resources exploitation which reduce the problem of waste disposal in such industries. Lastly, as the cost of using fuel is higher, people might use them much more efficient.
On the other hand, I would argue that there are much better measures to deal with environmental issues. Firstly, governments should spend more money on renewable energy researches, which includes wind, solar energies instead of nonrenewable energy sources. By doing this people can reduce energetic burden on nature. In my opinion, using renewable energy sources will extremely minimize the usage of petrol, coal and etc. Additionally, governments should educate population about environmental issues and their solutions.
In conclusion, I believe apart from increasing the prce of fuel, there are more effective ways to protect nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 569, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...uld lead to the minimization of natural resources exploitation which reduce the problem o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...f nonrenewable energy sources. By doing this people can reduce energetic burden on n...
^^^^
Line 7, column 414, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...mely minimize the usage of petrol, coal and etc. Additionally, governments should educat...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28252788104 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83312840295 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594795539033 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4293512118 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.416666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183054108042 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062800906557 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566870886375 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115993851345 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519486717255 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.