The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, states are spending big money to find life formulas on other planets. Some people believe that government’s spending on discovering life on other planets is unnecessary and states should spend more money on public problems in society. In this essay, I will scrutinize to what extend I agree or disagree.
On the one side of argument, in general, space explorations have special significance for the future of mankind. As we know, countries like USA, Russia are sending space voyagers and different devices to explore cosmos, moreover, to find other life formulas on other planets. For example, NASA sent robot called “Curiosity” to explore Mars deeply and in my view, discovering Mars will bring new scientific achievements to our civilization, also Mars might be full of clues about forming of life. Additionally, as a result of scientific researches scientists might use all gathered information to discover origin of Solar system, generally cosmos. Today, astronomers found thousands of planets, which are very similar to Earth and there might be life formula.
On the other hand, governments can address this money to the issues of public. In other words, mankind has big issues in Earth to solve, which determine the future of us. For instance, if states will spend their money on health care and education instead of space exploration, life quality in this country will increase extremely. Additionally, solving social issues might cause to increasing of social welfare.
Personally, to keep balance, developed countries should spend more money on space explorations, while developing countries should address this money to solve public problems instead of space exploration.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in general, as a result, in my view, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47547169811 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04368104505 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588679245283 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2079698523 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.615384615 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366326428275 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134416673456 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146508608347 0.0667982634062 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260129565625 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169089639151 0.056905535591 297% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.