The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?

Our world is facing many serious environmental problems. Some people suggest increasing the cost of fuel as a way to address the problems. However, I would argue that this is not a long-term solution to the global issues.

The first point to note is the capability of this resolution. There is the inevitable need of traveling by safe and modern vehicles nowadays and increasing the price of fuel is not likely to change that. Moreover, the higher cost of fuel will lead to the growth in the costs of many other products. This is clearly not a result that governments are expecting. In addition, waste and chemicals are also the cause of pollution. Trying to change the cost of fuel will not solve the problems completely, therefore, it is not a wise decision to make.

On the other hand, this idea does help in some ways. Fuel getting more expensive will reduce the number of cars on the streets which means less exhaust fumes is discharged into the air.

In conclusion, increasing the price of fuel has both negative and positive effects. Nevertheless, I personally think that it brings more disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 1615.20841683 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 191.0 315.596192385 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85340314136 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74922458049 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 176.041082164 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586387434555 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 506.74238477 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3588584409 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.3076923077 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6923076923 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204725916185 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621429620215 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695871227272 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107265300485 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605018858826 0.056905535591 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.