Killing animals as a sport has always been a part of our culture but in recent decades, it has become a moral dilemma. With ever-changing morality code and development, blood sports are considered mere display of cruelty and completely unfair to defenseless creatures. Therefore, in my opinion, these practices should be stopped with effective legislation and stringent punishments.
Bloodshed of animals in games like dog fighting, cock fighting and hunting is unethical due to various reason. Firstly, they are our evolutionary cousins and have emotional centers in their brains that are capable of feeling as much pain as humans can so, it is preposterous to inflict injuries to them for the sake of entertainment. Furthermore, such sports desensitize humans and normalizes violence against animals. Secondly, unchecked and frequent hunting has pushed many animal species to the verge of extinction. Moreover, animals dying due to whatever reasons has a disastrous effects on ecosystem because animals are our co-habitants on earth. Finally, animals are often killed on various festivals for the sake of cultural or religious rituals. However, a display of bloodshed at such massive level is totally against the rights of animals.
In my opinion, blood sports are atrocious and effective measures should be taken to protect animals from such violence. Government should introduce strict laws and ensure their implementation to prevent hunting and sports involving animals. Another way to ensure safety pf animals is to stop people from celebrating festivals that promote killing animals for cultural as well as religious reasons. In addition to this, people should be educated about the preposterous aspects of such games.
In conclusion, games involving animal fights have always been popular with masses but now people are starting to recognize the pain these species bear for the sake of human pleasure. However, I believe, only effective legislation and an immediate ban can alleviate the situation immediately so that endangered species can be protected and a more animal-loving society can be created in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 585, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ue to whatever reasons has a disastrous effects on ecosystem because animals are our co...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 383, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...re animal-loving society can be created in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4756097561 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93600568584 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567073170732 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4812842558 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218759751325 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06928534158 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403251650641 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135390306282 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382366582154 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.