Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.
Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages?
Because of its convenience, more and more users have changed their way of buying possessions on the e-market instead of regular grocery. From my point of view, e-market has plenty of benefits and so do a regular market.
On the one hand, the internet has almost everything exists in the world, and it is able to trade by cash.On the one hand, the internet has almost everything exist in the world, and it is able to trade by cash. For example, e-groceries provide large amount of stuffs with a different price so that people do not have limit to consider. About the price, e-market usually gives users special offers such as discount on specific events. Take shopee as an example, they have an event called "hunting sales" open every night for people to buy possessions with large discounts, which is super rare in regular shop.
On the other hand, despite the benefit of buying things on internet, it cannot compare with regular grocery in some sides. Because it is e-grocery, users cannot try or see the real appearance of things before decided to order, and it has plethora of detrimental problems. Using photoshop to enhance the quality of pictures, make it more attractive, and sometime the shop's owner will use completely different photos which have no similarity to their real products. Furthermore, people solely know the quality of products via rating comments instead of their own experiences, so that sellers will invite friends to give the products high rating even though it is not.
All in all, user when choosing the platform to go shopping have to consider seriously about the sort of products they are going to buy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
... world, and it is able to trade by cash.On the one hand, the internet has almost e...
^^
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'limited'.
Suggestion: limited
...ferent price so that people do not have limit to consider. About the price, e-market ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, for example, sort of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89964157706 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57354658904 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573476702509 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.6726500589 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.272727273 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164503693782 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608789716838 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506371031973 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951559504302 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03506388004 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.