Nowadays, the popularity of online shopping is growing faster, which means that shopping methods are going to be changed because of effective factors, such as time saving and variety of goods. Online shopping includes drawbacks, but these drawbacks are associated with benefits that make online shopping as a preference for almost all people.
Firstly, online shopping saves time, that you are not supposed to commute to the shopping mall, so online shopping has changed our living method. Secondly, the money spent on transportation, such as fuel expenses and transport charges will be saved for other uses Then you can purchase what you want by surfing on websites, choosing your ideal good by comparing with others and entering your bank card data. Later, you should just wait to get your ordered good in the next few hours or days, depending on your purchase. For example to buy a travel ticket, you are not supposed to go to a travel agency. You can compare choices and later buy your ideal one. Conversely, there are some drawbacks that could prevent shopping online.
Certainly, you have heard about online frauds. Some hackers get your bank card data when you enter them to the website and use them to get money from your bank account. This is not the only way of tricking. Some sellers are not honest as they pretend. They may present an ideal good on their websites, but when you receive your ordering, you will find out that it was just a fake introduction of that good. These are how they mar fraud you.
The drawbacks of online shopping are less in number, but high-risked. In conclusion, purchasing from real markets is a superior choice to shop online. Choose online shopping just in case you are too busy to spend your time on commuting to the markets. In this case, you are supposed to accept any outcome, even bad one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: less
.... The drawbacks of online shopping are less in number, but high-risked. In conclusion, purcha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to spend your time on commuting to the markets. In this case, you are supposed ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78616352201 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40072045935 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562893081761 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.9495756485 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5555555556 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17165624222 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592869464794 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034090506263 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11055684383 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267747530983 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.