Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past 30 years in the world that many cities now are "one big traffic jam".
How true do you think that this statement is?
What measure can government take to address this problem?
It is often believed that the ever-increasing demand for owning cars of modern people over the past few decades has brought about chronic traffic congestion in the majority of metro cities across the globe. Personally, I agree with this belief and I reckon that the government can tackle the problems by encouraging the use of public transport and banning cars entering city centers at peak hours.
Recently, the number of cars owned has increased dramatically, which is one of the main causes of traffic jams. Undoubtedly, when the number of cars exceeds the city’s road capacity, it will definitely lead to congestion. Take Ho Chi Minh city, which is the largest one in Vietnam, as an example. Thirty years ago, the main means of transport at that time were only bicycles and motorbikes, while only a few private cars were seen travelling around the city. However, the number of cars registered in this city now has boomed to around over two million units, while the city’s infrastructure was only designed to cope with around 500,000 cars. As a result of this, chaotic traffic congestion occurs everywhere in the city during peak hours, when the citizens have to move centimeter by centimeter. Clearly, the rapid growth of car ownership is a major culprit of overcrowded roads.
There are many measures that could be taken to address the issue. Firstly, the way forward might be to put ban on entering the center of the city by any means of transport, except for bicycle and public transit during rush hours. Besides, governments should build more sky and underground train systems and upgrade the quality of bus services in order to attract more passengers. Public transit such as buses or trains can accommodate many passengers at once. Therefore, if there are more people using public vehicles instead of private one, the problem of traffic jams could be lessened considerably.
In conclusion, although most cities are struggling with the issue of traffic congestion, authorities can alleviate this situation by improving public transport infrastructure and restricting the access of private vehicles.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, while, except for, i reckon, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17101449275 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79809999447 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591304347826 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7647413609 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.933333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230286774971 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728729609733 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037604201613 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13240964557 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393509716041 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.