The chart below gives information about Southeland's main exports in 2005, now, and future projections for 2025.
This bar chart illustrates the performance of Southland’s primary experts in 2000 and 2019. It also indicates future projections for 2025.
According to the data, it seems likely that international tourism will become the dominant industry on those dairy export will remain strong.
In 2000, we can see that tourism was the greatest exports earner of the three industries, with revenue standing at just over 8 billion. This figure has increased slightly, so that now, in 2019, it has reached almost 9 billion. It is estimated that international tourism will continue to grow, so that by 2025, it will be earning around 7 billion for the country. In 2000, dairy exports were worth around 7 billion, but since then there has been a dramatic increase, and sales for this year are approximately 10 billion. Experts are predicting that exports in this area may fall slightly, so a figure of 9.5 billion is expected for 2025.
Meat products are the third key industry in Southland, but sales have dropped since 2000 and now stand at 5.5 billion. It is expected that sales will continue to decrease in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this dairy' or 'those dairies'?
Suggestion: this dairy; those dairies
...sm will become the dominant industry on those dairy export will remain strong. In 2000,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill continue to decrease in the future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, so, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97340425532 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72993627394 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601063829787 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2489097566 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145005472652 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707021931962 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754046137475 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089244651004 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654537609715 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.