Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
It is often thought by some people that residents do not recycle their household waste adequately, so a legal law is necessary to force people to reuse. Personally, although I agree with a legal obligation, I think that is not the only feasible approach because there are numerous measurements that the government could take to improve the situation.
First of all, enacting a recycling law can be effective to eliminate negative impacts on the environment. People tend to throw away cans or bottles instead of recycling because they think it can be time-consuming compared to buying new ones. However, when the legal requirement is enacted, people will have to obey to convert their waste into usable products. If residents do not comply properly, they may be punished with a certain amount of fine or even a prison sentence. Thanks to the law, people may be more self-motivated to reuse their waste and significantly protect the environment.
On the other hand, the authority should also educate their inhabitants to promote their awareness. This approach may encourage people to recycle more actively. When people are aware of the importance of preserving the environment or their current global environmental issues, they may participate in recycling programs more enthusiastically. For example, EPA - United States Environmental Protection Agency has launched numerous environmental programs and campaigns such as healthy school environments to increases students and educators’ awareness and knowledge of environmental issues. So, environmental education can be a viable method to persuade inhabitants to recycle waste.
In conclusion, although governments do need to enact a legal obligation, it is not the only solution to solve this problem since they can educate to raise people's awareness as alternative methods.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54609929078 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2319660062 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585106382979 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.994140515 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312397739205 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117615260519 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726783241071 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199175410869 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517714143394 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.