Earlier technological development brought more changes to the life of ordinary people than recent technological development does. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a contentious issue that the technological invention and development in the early ages were more beneficial to normal people than that in recent years. Personally, I disagree with this idea because I believe that both early and recent technologies have had an equally significant impact on people’s life.
Besides the development of modern technologies, earlier creations still have had great impacts on ordinary people’s life. In fact, many previous inventions still play a pivotal role in society. For example, fire and electricity were two typical technological inventions in the early ages. Firstly, fire was used to warm and protect people from danger but the most important role of fire it led to a host of other key inventions and skills like cooking. The ability to cook helped us get more nutrients from food and improve people’s health. Secondly, electricity is one of the greatest inventions that are indispensable in people‘s lives as it runs the majority of gadgetry nowadays.
On the other hand, modern inventions have made great contributions to take humans a fantastic move as well as improve people’s living standard. The inventions of computers and the internet are typical instances. Undoubtedly, computers have greatly expanded human capabilities as they opened the information age. Computer software can store information more effectively and boost the progress of work. Secondly, the development of the internet has enhanced connectivity within the community thanks to the social network. Moreover, it has also opened international markets and created a boom in the world economy.
In conclusion, during human history, many massive breakthroughs and great inventions have been created. All technologies have great impacts on people’s daily life, so no matter they invented early or recently, all technological inventions bring manifold benefits to ordinary people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eatest inventions that are indispensable in people's lives as it runs the ma...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63356164384 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19613400301 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585616438356 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0455061313 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8125 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4375 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20975815892 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679839498694 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804655171359 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14749468244 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889994970297 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.