Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people are of the opinion that understanding our olden days is valueless for contemporary people. Personally, I disagree with this belief due to history’s crucial roles in arousing our patriotism as well as providing us with invaluable lessons.
To begin with, various invaluable experiences can be gained from people in the past. It is undeniable that stories about a successful person’s life could teach readers about how to avoid failures and what they should do to improve their opportunities for success. One persuasive evidence of this can be Bill Gates, who is one of the most affluent men on earth. In an interview with TIME in 2017, Bill Gates mentioned that reading biographies of famous figures throughout history since he was a kid has significantly influenced his life and mind, which has in turn positively impacted his career and lifestyle. Clearly, acquiring knowledge of historic figures and events does vastly benefit people.
Besides, gaining a deep understanding of our ancestors’ sacrifices in protecting our countries’ peace and freedom would dramatically inspire us to become more patriotic. Being born in a peaceful world, many people, particularly children, may be ignorant about how heroic their forefather’s generations were to fight for their future. Therefore, learning about wars and conflicts in former days is vital, especially at schools to cultivate kids’ patriotism, which later motivates them to work for the prosperity of the nation and its people. It has been clearly shown that numerous school trips to war museums have considerably triggered students’ respect for their country.
For the reasons mentioned above, I firmly believe that modern generations could reap a host of advantages when learning about the past because of its contribution to enhancing people’s knowledge and their love towards their own countries. Therefore, I would like to suggest that history should always be a compulsory subject in school curricula.
(311 words)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ubject in school curricula. 311 words
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, so, therefore, well, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53697749196 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18644163991 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652733118971 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9734639711 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.461538462 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128265629097 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039281515234 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400197294133 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772969446035 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00578782454649 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.