The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the information about the terms of proportion of wealth donated to charity which was in two decades by several age groups of British citizens during 1990 and 2010.
In overall, people who were in fifties and senior citizens constituted a major for gave money to charity since youngsters donated least amount of income. However, there were lots of transformation can be noticed in all age periods who expend money on charities over the periods.
It can be seen from the information that between 1990 British natives who related to age 36-50 was most popular for providing wealth to charity which accounted at more than a two fifth. Similarly, it decreased slightly at over a third from 2010. In contrast, contribution of young ones for charities was above 15% in 1990 and experienced a declined of one in ten during remained year. Likewise, the percentage of English older people who donated money to charity was found 35% and almost a little less than a third respectively from 2010 to 1990.
The graph further proves that between 26-35 age range British natives spend over a three in ten percent of the total percentage of their income on charities during 1990. Furthermore, a drastic dropout noticed in their proportion at approximately a quarter in the end of the period. Even though, grey haired people was second more famous age group for giving wealth to charity at 35% in the beginning of the year. Lastly, it increased dramatically and reached to peak level at Nearly two fifth in last year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'donated the least'.
Suggestion: donated the least
... gave money to charity since youngsters donated least amount of income. However, there were l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, lastly, likewise, second, similarly, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92692307692 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65281752641 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530769230769 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.871465959 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.454545455 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26390039384 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971598065819 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553915326932 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159594735086 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308798584035 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.