The chart shows sector contributing in GDP in the UK from 1990 to 2000
nowadays most green energy is becoming ever more prevalent in both development and developing countries some argue that day greatly reduced cost and are better for the environment other believe they are a serious threat to energy security
The given bar chart illustrates, information about contributing by two sectors namely IT industry and Service industry in Gross Domestic Product in the UK between 1992 and 2000.
The data is calibrated into percentage.
In 1992, the contribution by IT industry in Gross Domestic product was just above 6% and it rose by 8% in 1994. But it remained constant in 1996. It was 8%. Between 1992 and 2003 bution by IT industry in Gross Domestic product was 10% and almost 15% respectively.
By the contrast, 4% contribution by Service industry in Gross Domestic product, in 1992. In 1994 and 1996, it increased 6% and 7% respectively. It experienced that, approximately 7% contribution by service industry and it rose 8% in 2000.
Overall, it is evident that, contribution by IT industry in Gross Domestic product was the highest whereas the lowest contribution in GDP from service industry in given time.
These days, in developing Nations and in developed green energy is gaining popularity more and more, but it is believed by few individuals that it is better for environment that if the cost greatly decline where as other individual argue that, it is hard to save green energy, because they are a serious danger to energy security. This essay will intend to analyse the both views along with my perspective.
On the one hand, there are few reasons why people believe that green energy and reduce cost are beneficial for environment. The prominent one is that, this energy is very helpful to the nature and people. because this energy produced without any pollution and people get it without any trouble. There are some sources of energy which produce to solar energy such as solar panels. For example, in Japan, thousands of solar panel install for energy. Hence, the people of Japan save their money as well as their involvement.
On the other hand, some people favour that it is a serious issue for people and it's find too hard. To explain it, for this energy individuals require a lot of equipments such as technological devices, gadgets as well as tools. Because they do not handle without these requirements. For instance, in Singapore, individuals use more and more natural resources for their purposes, solar panel electronic vehicles and so on. As a result, in Singapore people face many problems because they use natural resources in very large amount please natural resources are available resources and also these available in a limit.
To recapitulate, although, green energy is beneficial for environment. Yet, I believe that individuals used continuously these natural resources than one day these disappear because these available in limit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 207, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...onment that if the cost greatly decline where as other individual argue that, it is hard...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 205, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
... very helpful to the nature and people. because this energy produced without any pollut...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 227, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ical devices, gadgets as well as tools. Because they do not handle without these requir...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, well, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 439.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08656036446 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82341072709 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473804100228 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.9 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 63.6709792606 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.32 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.56 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.38176352705 205% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21060893343 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499069643339 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596807234755 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837839863194 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690364006169 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.