Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some of or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?
In these days, the question of whether or not children’s education should be funded by the authorities aroused people’s discussion. Although this trend is not without the disadvantages, the upsides will be far more significant.
This trend certainly exerts some detrimental implications to both individuals and the governments. First, since a sustainable development of a nation requires to have many investments in many fields, paying all of the costs for children’s education can put a heavy burden on national budget. In fact, the governments need to properly subsidize for many key areas, such as healthcare, economy, education, which implies that every citizen should shoulder the responsibility of paying for their children’s schooling fees. Second, by supporting children’s education, either a part or all of the costs, national and local authorities could create unfairness to childless people. This means that they may feel angry or irritated if knowing that their tax income is not spent on their benefits.
There are, however, some dazzling advantages that can easily overshadow the disadvantages of this sponsorship. First, in order to guarantee the qualified workforce down the road, investing in children’s education is considered as a win-win solution. This means that meagre income families can let their children, especially aspiring ones, go to school, which will in turn bring national workforce an array of benefits in the sense that young generations will become qualified and talented employees. Second, if parents released the burden from their children’s tuition fees, there is a good chance that they would have a good take care of their offspring. For example, parents can have more budgets to buy more food or clothes for their youngsters, improving their standard of living as a result.
In conclusion, it is a wise decision when the governments are inclined to finance children’s education, even some or all of it, despite some disadvantages anticipated. By acknowledging the importance of children education, officials will lead their country to a higher level of development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In these days, the question of whether or not children’s education should be f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...many investments in many fields, paying all of the costs for children’s education can put ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, even so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50764525994 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14951454555 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574923547401 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.858052766 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.642857143 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237302616386 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080987251068 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862047137842 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151840122423 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942366611103 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.