Rapid advent of technology has drastically revolutionized our lives and education is not an exception to this. With increasingly driven by technology, there would be no scope for tutors in class and everything will be automated. I completely disagree with the statement and believe that teachers are irreplaceable.
To begin with, computers are programmed boxes which are written to abide by the instructions present in them. To put it simply, they can work only for the scenarios they know and will falter in other. For example, a machine familiar with addition operations will not perform when asked with a question on subtraction. On the other side, teachers have vast experience in their fields and an in depth knowledge to share with the students in the classroom.
Secondly, teachers have emotions and human understanding which is required in teaching. In other words, they are far better in observing the behavior of students, attitude, strong and weak points which they may easily guide and mentor. In contrast, robotic mode of teaching does not have these characteristics, considering they being non-human, thereby guiding others as an extremely difficult task, especially when in distress.
Finally, coaches could understand their trainees better than anyone else, as they themselves have gone through that phase of learning and growing. When it comes to choosing a career path or doubt clearing in personal or their professional area, teachers would provide them the most effective way, considering that they being aware of the market trends and inferring from others who have attended their lectures. Hence, replacing them with computers needs to analyzed again, especially keeping future of the youngsters in mind.
In conclusion, plethora form of mentoring has come into picture suddenly, however teacher's presence ought to be always there in the benefit of bright society and economy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40133779264 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86087902703 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638795986622 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.775625957 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.357142857 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149002964696 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525523663918 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587853625899 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901915226592 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563530827622 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.