Companies use a variety of methods to increase sales of their products
What different methods are being used?
Which is the most effective?
It has been a hot topic of debate in terms of procedures which corporations can activate in order to proliferate the outcomes of products. In practical terms, numerous methods have been taken into consideration, personally speaking, I believe that the adaptation and installation of modern technologies are the driving force behind propagating goods' sales.
Several ways in which companies can pursue to accelerate their sales. Concentration on marketing strategies and advertisements has been cited as one of the most efficient methods. This protocol has depended on the fact that the first impression of products and the exaltation of companies promote customers to make a purchase. In addition to this, improving factories' infrastructures, technologies and computerising manufacturing processes are noteworthily concerned since they can assure an adequate amount of goods to catch up with consumers' demands and expectations. Consistently important, intensifying and encapsulating domestic integrations and international interrelationships contribute significantly to this achievement.
As far as I am concerned, the most effective ways to increase products' sales is to upgrade companies' facilities. First and foremost, a smaller amount of time is required for the production process alongside less spending on staff's remuneration since robots are responsible for this procedure. As a result, goods will be more reasonably priced, especially for the lower-income class of society, Moreover, technological improvements and installations can assist a variety of goods at high qualities and quantities to target distinctive potential customers. In other words, this strategy can attract a wide range of consumers, either national or international.
To put things in a nutshell, although several effective methods are being implemented with the aim to escalate products' outcomes, from my perspective, the adaptation of modern technology is prevalently the preponderant force behind this accomplishment. Paradoxically, I suggest that governments should be involved in this effort since they are capable of making goods distribution more efficiently.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, in addition, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00649350649 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.62688932741 2.80592935109 129% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626623376623 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6495683632 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.307692308 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174284973274 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602657718122 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668710229049 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959439372734 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260339247688 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.