Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
National facilities developments have been a common topic of debate for decades. As technological enhancement, people all around the world are becoming more aware of transportation. This raises the question if national authorities should invest in improvements of railways instead of roads. In my perspective, I totally agree with this view.
The reason for this is travelling by train is likely to be well adapted to a wide range of personal expenses on transportation. For example, in Japan or the US, according to the result of experiments based on satisfaction of customers on the railway system, more than 70% of candidates claim that the reason why they enjoy subways is the affordable price. Furthermore, as technology develops, trains are reported to be one of the most environmentally friendly means of transport. This is primarily because trains are mostly powered by electricity or nuclear power which do not release any little amount of CO2 into the atmosphere. In addition, commuting by subways can contribute to the reduction of traffic congestion in many metropolises.
If national authorities invest in road systems rather than railways, the consequences may be catastrophic. While railways systems are mostly built underground, the majority of roads require large areas on the surface to be constructed. As a result, forests and jungles which absorb CO2 in the air will be gradually felled to accommodate new roads that can worsen the air pollution issues. Moreover, vehicles traveling on roads release extremely high noise and CO2 which negatively affect citizens' lives. Consequently, more government revenue based on taxes is spent to solve these problematic situations, therefore, are likely to reverse the developing trend of a country.
To put things in a nutshell, I am totally of the statement illustrating that railways should be prefered to be invested in stead of roads due to its advantages at both economic and environmental aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'instead of'?
Suggestion: instead of
...lways should be prefered to be invested in stead of roads due to its advantages at both eco...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34838709677 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21475526359 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616129032258 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7289631963 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.533333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181449301917 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549147157791 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505708195976 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103974380288 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226912422569 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.