Computers and modems have made it possible for office workers to do much of their work from home instead of working at offices every day. Working from home should be encouraged as it is good workers and employers.
Do you agree or disagree.
Computers, gadgets and other developed instruments have made lives full of welfare for human beings, and teleworking is one of them. It includes lots of advantageous and disadvantageous, which I will mention in my essay.
In one hand, it is beneficial for employer, especially for entrepreneur who aren’t as wealthy as giant industries owners for renting a sufficient venue or paying commuting cost, so it balances competing situation. In the other hand, it is useful for stuff and employee too. They are permitted to be with their family, to do their family and their employee responsibilities simultaneously. By this facility, some of the common and social-oriented issues can be solved. For example, traffic jam, air pollution and many other problems will be mitigated. Rush hours will turn to a calm period. As a considerable benefit, Life cost will be reduced.
By contrast, it has its own drawbacks, human beings will turn to isolated people, and the real group working (team) will be disappeared slightly. Most of the people may spend all of their times at home in front of the screen, so they will be addicted to staying in home; therefore they will suffer from different disease (physically and mentally) in coming years. The previous border between work and private life will disappear, therefore it can be a tremendous threat for their private life.
In conclusion, teleworking has its own merits and demerits. Both aspects are important. By the way I agree with teleworking due to the mentioned worthwhile, which can sugarcoat the disadvantageous, however this disastrous effects must not be forgotten.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 412, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ities simultaneously. By this facility, some of the common and social-oriented issues can b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20992366412 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12132774735 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618320610687 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.8709675821 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169099240916 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464789649014 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423134037095 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849602047391 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05391306305 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.