Computers are being used more and more in education. Some people say that this is a positive trend, while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences
Discuss both sides of this argument and then give your own opinion.
The present education system has been revolutionized wherein the usage of computer devices has become prominent. few people support this development, whereas others oppose due to perceived repercussions. I strongly advocate this advancement in the field of education which will be elaborated in the following essay
First and foremost, the future of education is unimaginable without technology. As most of the activities right from maintaining of the database of students, dissemination of knowledge and teaching certain subjects like computers cannot be performed without the use of these high-tech machines. most of these educational houses now even conduct online classes for specialised courses for the international students thus aiding them to spread their services globally. Furthermore, this also helps the to decipher complex subjects to the pupils which facilitates better understanding. Therefore it seems that, use of technology in education has many benefits for not only students but also the institutions.
On the contrary, too much incorporation of technology in education may digress the students from studies. For instance, there are numerous computing games while are available extensively which might at times divert the inclination of the learners away from studies. also, because of this students might rely more on technology and they would seldom use their own acumen. this may eventually hamper his overall development. However with proper monitoring of student activities and controlled usage can deter such negative developments.
To conclude, implementation of computer technology in every aspect of education seems to be the future for fostering students as well as bolstering the infrastructure of education houses. I strongly believe to advocated this trend despite few manageable cons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Few
... computer devices has become prominent. few people support this development, wherea...
^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Most
...ut the use of these high-tech machines. most of these educational houses now even co...
^^^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...which facilitates better understanding. Therefore it seems that, use of technology in edu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 267, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...tion of the learners away from studies. also, because of this students might rely mo...
^^^^
Line 8, column 372, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...they would seldom use their own acumen. this may eventually hamper his overall devel...
^^^^
Line 8, column 424, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ntually hamper his overall development. However with proper monitoring of student activ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, may, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82527881041 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16363648205 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631970260223 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9835511816 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.928571429 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162586692664 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578190942512 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446786893239 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103044638116 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303236700613 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.