The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The given two pie charts compare the percentage of online sales for four different sectors such as electronic and appliance, food and beverage, home furnishings and video games in Canada in two different years, 2005 and 2010.
Overall, In both years, the stock of video games and food as beverages increased whereas the sale of other two sectors like electronic and appliances as well as home furnishing dropped in two years.
Going back to the significant consideration of pie chart, In 2005, the online sale of video games was only 18% which, however increased up to 23% in 2010. Similarly, food and beverages were sold by 22% in 2015 which rose by ten percent in 2010.
On the other hand, the online sale of electronic and appliances which was 35% in Canada in 2005 decreased by five percent in 2010 (30%). Furthermore,the sale of home furnished also decreased from 25% to 15% between 2005 to 2010 respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d up to 23% in 2010. Similarly, food and beverages were sold by 22% in 2015 which...
^^
Line 6, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of electronic and appliances which was 35% in Canada in 2005 decreased by five ...
^^
Line 6, column 147, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...by five percent in 2010 30%. Furthermore,the sale of home furnished also decreased f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, well, whereas, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85987261146 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73160052824 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528662420382 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0971239611 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.166666667 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.6666666667 5.23603664747 318% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.