The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

The given line chart illustrates figures for a survey occurred in 2011 about the number of enquiries sent to the Tourist Information Office in one city during a half year period.

In general, the graph shows the distinct difference between the three mentioned features in over six months. While the number of direct enquiries and the enquiries sent by telephone increase rapidly in the last half of the research and tend to continue rising in the future, Tourist Information Office seem less receive enquiries by letter or email than before.

In three priory months of the research, the initial figures range between 400 and 900, and there are not any remarkable change in this stage. This status continues until the 4th month of the survey, the number of enquiries sent by letter and email goes down at high speed. It decreases from about 700 requires to below 400 while the other features become more familiar in society. Specifically, the number of requires in person that the Tourist Information Office received in March reaches 800, and those received by telephone reach 1000 in the same month. Subsequently, the number of direct enquiries rockets and peaks in June at over 1800. Those sending by telephones follows soon after at 1600 in June.

In brief, the vast majority of citizens seem to use telephones to present their enquiries more often than by letter or email these days. This status may be the result of industrialization

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... letter or email these days. This status may be the result of industrialization ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, while, in brief, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97933884298 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56953366281 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557851239669 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9600907045 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.545454545 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394503670332 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11660045605 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103252766293 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217569669071 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116413428111 0.0819641961636 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.