The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
A glance at the graph provided illustrates the number of enquiries observed by the Tourist Information Office in a particular city for the first six months in 2011.
In general, of all the three sectors involved in the statistic, the majority observed increment throughout the years.
In detail, the most distinguished line might be writing forms by the means that it is only the component witnessed gradual decline. The line was, initially, at approximately 750 values, which followed by the insignificant slight for three months, stated at 700 values in March. Subsequently, the sectors started to decrease considerably in the next two months, less than 400 in May, which is followed by the stagnation. Telephone, despite having experienced a moderate dip at the beginning, specifically at 800 values. Lastly, the face - to - face method had the most brilliant increase as the time went by.In June, the value was roughly 1900 as the highest values. Moreover, there was such a dramatic disparity between the quantity in January and middle of the years, up to respectively 1200 values.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 608, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... brilliant increase as the time went by.In June, the value was roughly 1900 as the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, may, moreover, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21590909091 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96852571678 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664772727273 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.7283208003 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.75 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113744958449 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052641986416 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139277604577 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140378630443 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198525363039 0.0819641961636 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.