Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Over the past few decades, technology has been increasingly influencing our daily routine. There is an argument about whether the most critically influencing innovation of our world is the computer. This essay completely disagrees with the given statement and will provide two reasons to elaborate on that.
The first reason is that computers have never demonstrated the need for themselves amongst every occupation. Simply put, the computer may not be essential to some individuals who are familiar with the conventional noting method. It is because those people do not need a computer to work effectively. However, it may be useful to the programmer who have to run their Javascript or Python code online. For this reason, the value of a computer can be estimated by oneself.
Another reason is that the importance of invention cannot be valued by a certain methodology. The scientific research may explain the right typology to evaluate the necessity of computers in modern days, however, there will be opposed by other studies conducted to convey the gap of that method. Furthermore, the psychological survey about personal preference conducted by Social Psychology Society explained that personal experience will affect the result in almost every marking criteria. Therefore, it is impossible to say that computers have become the most important innovation of our time.
In conclusion, with the former reason I have mentioned earlier, it cannot be assumed that computers have been necessary for living nowadays. Moreover, there is no particular estimation to promote the value of each technology without any gaps or human confirmation bias.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41472868217 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96099932052 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612403100775 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0086590564 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7857142857 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198900133744 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706502429993 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505711816566 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112130063658 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244178590067 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.