The consumption of the world's resources (oil, and water etc.) is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are causes and solutions?
Nowadays, more and more world’s fuels are used at a significant level. Although there are some reasons behind this situation, several ways can implement to resolve the problem.
Several causes lead to the increase of using the world’s resources. Firstly, the need for energy is climbed up by civilization and the growth of economies around the globe. Therefore, companies and factories have to consume more fuel to manufacture more goods and products for societies. Secondly, the dramatic rise in demand in the transportation of people also pressures on natural resources such as oil or gasoline. For example, in Vietnam, inhabitants usually commuted by bicycles in 1995 while the main transportation of citizens, in 2015, were cars, trains or even planes.
Therefore, there are two solutions to tackle this situation. On the one hand, governments should search for alternative fuels such as wind energy which will alleviate the burden on fossil fuels and also can maintain the demand for societies. For instance, in Bac Lieu province of Vietnam, dozens of windmills were constructed to create the energy not only for this place but also other sites nearby. On the other hand, authorities have to enforce the laws to reduce the consumption of people in communities. For example, in 2030, in Ho Chi Minh city, commuting by motorcycles will be inhibited in the city's center, and Vietnam's government also encourages citizens to use public transportation such as buses or trains.
In conclusion, while the consumption of fuels on Earth tends to grow rapidly at a dramatic proportion, there are several solutions to solve this burden.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...015, were cars, trains or even planes. Therefore, there are two solutions to ta...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ansportation such as buses or trains. In conclusion, while the consumption of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27756653992 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95579874657 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58174904943 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8188699209 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.769230769 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100012023061 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422857830462 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532510041383 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712057211316 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329041420487 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.