Corporal punishment is the best form of discipline. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that smacking or spanking is the most effective disciplinary technique for behavior management with children. I completely disagree with this view.
One the one hand, the use of force is barbaric and there are many other forms of discipline should instead be used to teach good behavior. In fact, a wide range of alternatives such as verbal correction, grounding, withholding of pocket money are justified to be viable and helpful in behavior management. For instance, the principle of grounding which ban children from getting out of the place of residence for pleasure will effectively preventing them from behave badly afterwards because the fear of not being able to play with friends is bigger than that of being smacked or spanked.
On the other hand, parental use of physical punishment suggest that violence can be acceptable. This may lead to children’s criminal offences in their future because they believe that violence is an effective weapon to make other people act as their will and unflinchingly inflict force on them until the victims show signs of obedience. In fact, there is a link between criminals, bullies or behavior disorders and being beaten by their parents as part of their upbringing. As a result, corporal punishment would be counter-productive and only convey harmful message of the use of violence to achieve someone’s aim.
In conclusion, physical chastisement is not an effective form of child education and even counterproductive. There are many discipline technique available and should be used according to the degree of the child’s disobedience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 439, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'prevent'
Suggestion: prevent
...residence for pleasure will effectively preventing them from behave badly afterwards becau...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3515625 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16659813522 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5620977262 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.545454545 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.052630581033 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0260789953378 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307533884015 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.032539326611 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0108214202454 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.