Countries should try to produce all the food for the population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that the government should sustain citizens’ lives by encouraging food self-sufficiency instead of importing foods from other countries. Personally, I partly agree with this view because while food manufacturing can help create more jobs and save transportation costs, purchasing food might also lead to close international relationships and more healthy food competition.
On the one hand, there are several advantages of food production. The first one is that it offers more agricultural jobs for citizens, which can contribute to the decrease of unemployment rate. Consequently, farmers can manufacture more food and generate revenue for their country. Furthermore, food self-sufficiency assists people in reducing transportation costs. In other words, less money is spent on delivering food within the country as opposed to from overseas. As a result, people can save a significant amount of money to invest in other sectors such as accommodation or education.
On the other hand, we can gain benefits from importing food for several reasons. Firstly, because of the expansion of food supply, fair competition among companies is encouraged. For instance, some local food manufacturers try to raise their products’ quality to meet consumers’ needs. Secondly, global food trading allows countries to strengthen relationships with other nations. For example, America often import quality rice from Asian countries such as Vietnam or Thailand. If there were no international connections, economically disadvantaged countries would not receive any support or investments from other developing countries.
In conclusion, I claim that producing all food for the citizens leads to the higher employment rate and the lower delivering cost while international food trading can also bring about some benefits including the fairer food competition and the strong relationships among countries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82206405694 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2967300038 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597864768683 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1852978757 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.066666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6666666667 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293065382442 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105118569635 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534081165834 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194681594282 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288478985783 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.