Some people claim that countries should attempt to supply food for their own citizens and limit the importation of food from other areas. Personally, I strongly disagree with this idea because of several reasons which will be explained in this essay.
To begin with, it is nearly impossible to provide domestic residents with all the food they need. Firstly, due to geographical locations and climates, many countries find it hard to produce certain kinds of dishes. For example, those without coastal areas are not able to produce types of seafood such as tuna or lobsters. Therefore, if these countries decided to stop importing food, their citizens would have very limited options in terms of what to eat. Secondly, since many developed nations tend to focus on industrial and technological progress, they do not have enough workers in agriculture to generate a sufficient amount of food for their citizens.
At the same time, the importation of food is beneficial for everyone. First of all, nowadays, with more developed transportation systems, delivering food across nations is easier and cheaper, and this allows people to enjoy a variety of dishes coming from all over the globe. For instance, those in Europe can still eat tropical fruits such as mangoes and durians. Furthermore, thanks to the importation and exportation of food, each nation can focus on their own strengths. To be more specific, more developed parts of the world can allocate more resources to manufacturing industries, while less developed countries can invest in agriculture, helping farmers earn more income and improve their standard of living.
In conclusion, I believe it is almost impossible for countries, especially those in the developed world, to provide their local citizens with sufficient food. Thus, the importation of food should be encouraged, because it brings about a wider range of choices for consumers and helps nations concentrate on developing their key areas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29073482428 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81426672041 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594249201278 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.214497354 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.285714286 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282789583304 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104627911359 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630599612431 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182265639657 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033627310793 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.