The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 to 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates information about how many incidents in three areas of crime in Newport city over a nine-year period between 2003 and 2012. Overall, the number of burglaries declined significantly while the quantities of car thefts and robberies fluctuated slightly over the timescale.
Looking at the details, as regards burglary, the figure started at around 3400 incidents in 2003, which was far higher than that of robbery. Then it rose to nearly 3800 before experiencing a sharp decrease to just above 1100 in 2008. After that, the figure went up slightly to just under 1500 in 2009, and then it underwent a slight fluctuation towards the end of the period, ending at approximately 1400.
Meanwhile, the number of car theft incidents was around 2800, ranking second in the starting year. Having remained almost stable in the next two years, it then fell to just above 2000 in 2006. Following this, there was a little fluctuation in the number of car thefts from 2006 to 2009 before going up gradually to about 2700 in 2012, becoming the most popular in the three areas of crime. Similarly, the figure for robbery was around 700 incidents in 2003. This was followed by a slight fluctuation between 500 and nearly 900 from 2003 to 2012.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, similarly, then, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88732394366 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.582944823 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596244131455 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.05608568 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114217635498 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479370747616 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683026581416 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867461828709 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575189623747 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.