The chart below show the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in newport City Centre from 2003 to 2012. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares change that occur in burglary, car theft and robbery in the inner city between 2003 and 2012.
From an overall analysis, it is vivid that the number of cases of burglary in the inner city fell considerable over the period, whereas incidence of Car theft and robbery shown fluctuating trend in given time period.
Between 2003 and 2004, the numbers of crimes related to burglary rose from around 3400 to a peak of around 3800, though figures of Car theft and robbery increased gradually during the same period of time. After two years, incident of burglary and car theft were dropped drastically by almost 2600 and 2000 respectively. Meanwhile, slightly decline was seen in crimes of theft from person (robbery) accounted for 500 cases.
Moving further, by 2012, the number of crimes committed by car thefts in the centre of city had surged to around 3000. In contrast, burglary had reduced by the end of given time period which was witnessed at less than 1500 incidents, while robbery remained by far the least committed crime, with figure below 1000 cases each year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... From an overall analysis, it is vivid that the number of cases of burglary in ...
^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ery increased gradually during the same period of time. After two years, incident of burglary ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90860215054 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33541975991 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602150537634 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1320586142 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111172003847 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617700620978 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405369862656 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784407186569 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299912328391 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.