some people work for the same organisation all their working life. others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Labouring in only one company from their early career to until their retirement is preferred by some demographic of society, while others believe that working for different organisation is a better experience. Eventhough, both the conflicting preceptions have their own valid reason, I strongly favour the former view point.
It is fairly easy to comprehend why some individuals are in disharmony with the first assertion. The prepondrent reason is that they think that if Masses doing jobs in different companies, they get more chances to learn new skills. As by meeting with more people, they have chance to experience different companies culture, Ergo; they become more versatile. Moreover, many Universities graduates have take jobs that are not related to their studies because they do not want to rely on their parents and to fulfill their daily necessary commodities student start part time jobs. For example, many students who choose to study abroad do part time jobs, like in restaurant and fill their University fees by own. so, after completing their study they switch these types of jobs and prefer to work in the stream, which is related to their study. In short, working in different sectors is more beneficial to learn new skills and experience.
Nevertheless, I would agree with those who are in harmony with this ideology and acknowledge that working in same factor is more beneficial for employees. When workers stay in same jobs they estabilize meaningful professional relationship in job sites which is a necessary to find real job satisfaction. Additionally, being loyal in company often leads employees to get promotion opportunities. This is particularly true in sectors that value experiences. Furthermore, myriad companies have long-term goals that requires a continued commitment and dedication to achieve that goals. For instance,in research centers, researchers do work on things or matter and they have many aspects related to these things are matter for search. So, they need a plenty of time and dedication to search on them. Thus, work for one organisation is advantageous and a development policy.
To recapitulate, although altering companies can enhance new skills in people's.l, I believe that sticking to one organisation life-long can offer profession growth and real job satisfaction to employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-01 | preetsidhu29500@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2022-09-10 | kavi jk | 56 | view |
| 2021-04-26 | Gagandhillon | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-05 | dieulinh75072 | 67 | view |
- Establishing good relationship in workplace is not important as the primary goal of every person is to focus on work To what extent extent do you agree with this statement 56
- The table below gives information about population of over 60 years old in regions in 2000 and the predicted numbers of population over 60 in 2050 it also show the world population over 60 in 2000 and 2050 84
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world what are the reason for this and suggest some solutions 78
- The chart below show the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in newport City Centre from 2003 to 2012 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European City in 1960 1980and 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o comprehend why some individuals are in disharmony with the first assertion. The...
^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'commodities'' or 'commodity's'?
Suggestion: commodities'; commodity's
...ts and to fulfill their daily necessary commodities student start part time jobs. For examp...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...ily necessary commodities student start part time jobs. For example, many students who ch...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 638, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... students who choose to study abroad do part time jobs, like in restaurant and fill their...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 712, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... and fill their University fees by own. so, after completing their study they swit...
^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...actor is more beneficial for employees. When workers stay in same jobs they estabili...
^^^^
Line 5, column 596, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...tion to achieve that goals. For instance,in research centers, researchers do work o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3722826087 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98844730336 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6642335118 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.833333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268278884439 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813920717671 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884794960291 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168057703436 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876493170661 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.