As a country develops, people tend to buy more cars. Do the advantage for individual outweigh the environmental disadvantage.
The first world countries or nations having stability and progresses, there citizens also have stable or above average lifestyle and each person try to purchase their personal transport vehicle. This thing have advantages for person only because it bring ease in life. But if each and everyone own private cars then this thing have serious environmental damages by causing pollution. But we cannot say that positive aspect can decrease the harmful effect on our planet.
The people from advance countries have more money with comparison to thirds world nations. Therefore, its natural people spend money to bring happiness and facilities in life to make it easily. On thing is personal cars which mostly individuals purchase when they get money, because with own vehicle there is no worry about timetable to follow of public transport. And its advantageous when someone play trip or tour all necessary equipment can be transport easily. The reason is that public buses have little space and a lot of people to travel with. For example, outdoor parties and picnic require more stuff to carry with personal car its bring facilitation.
Although cars bring facility for people but it causing more devastating effects on environment by exhaust fumes emitted by them. These vehicles smoke causing serious air pollution across the world. The carbon dioxide quantity of air is consistently increasing and causing global warming and climate change. And this thing is damaging entire globe in more alarming way. Its not reasonable to harm all world for just personal leisure for only some people. While transport system in developed countries is also excellent, one can easily travel through. Most of gases emitted by countries having personal transport for instance, the ozone layer have whole in it and depleting because of excessive amount of harmful fumes content in atmosphere.
In conclusion, rich nations buy luxuries for personal facilitation and content among them one is vehicles, which bring easiness in their life but for limited people who can afford them. While its disadvantages to atmosphere are bearing all world, therefore, for only certain number of people we cannot damage our environment. And its cannot outweigh the hazardous impact to environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'brings'?
Suggestion: brings
...e advantages for person only because it bring ease in life But if each and everyone o...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 395, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'plays'.
Suggestion: plays
...sport And its advantageous when someone play trip or tour all necessary equipment ca...
^^^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the gases') or simply say ''Most gases''.
Suggestion: Most of the gases; Most gases
...excellent one can easily travel through Most of gases emitted by countries having personal tr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, therefore, third, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20833333333 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52420229424 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522222222222 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 360.0 20.2975951904 1774% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1875.0 106.682146367 1758% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 360.0 20.7667163134 1734% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 97.0 7.06120827912 1374% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237020512418 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.237020512418 0.084324248473 281% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141850095054 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341921335286 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 183.1 13.0946893788 1398% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -302.38 50.2224549098 -602% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 144.9 11.3001002004 1282% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.42 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 25.26 8.58950901804 294% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 146.0 10.1190380762 1443% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 57.0 10.7795591182 529% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.