Coutrries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree ar disagree?
It seems evident that in some countries the daily basis working hours are longer than those in others. This practice is obviously based on the assumption that the harder work, the more prosperous economy. However, I believe that there are more influential factors than time for national development.
The holders of this view might think that investing more time in work contributes to more production, hence helping create more wealth. It is irrefutable that there is a direct link between how long a worker works and the outcome. For example, 10 hours of working could achieve a double result of 5 hours. However, it is not the production but productivity that is responsible for economic success. In some developing countries such as Vietnam and Thailand, the working time is longer but the respective GDP is lower than developed countries like the USA and Japan.
Besides, Prolonging working time actually imposes some incidental negative impact on a country's economy. The first one is the potential growing health care cost and because fatigue tends to harm the employee's health, therefore leading to more consumption of medical resources. In addition to the economic loss, the decreasing of workers on satisfaction can affect productivity negatively. For instance, Absenteeisms ans sick leaves are reported by many employers due to tiredness.
In conclusion, I personally argue that instead of prolonging working hours, the government is expected to enhance machines, engines, or applying up-to-date devices to boost productivity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...t and because fatigue tends to harm the employees health, therefore leading to more consu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, hence, however, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39004149378 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92355381131 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630705394191 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3018277154 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9230769231 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279301528004 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901220786946 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054869217186 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153876714089 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892177936985 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.