Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Human activities, such as deforestation and urbanization have narrowed the space for other species on earth or even threaten their existence. Some believe that the damage is irreversible therefore we could do nothing, whereat others persist in carrying out the effective measures to tackle this current situation. This essay extents to discuss both perspectives, but I strongly side with the latter.
To begin with, some people believe that the damage to other species can not be solved. Practically, throughout history, there are many examples, which support the pessimistic view, namely the extinct of dinosaurs. They point out that even we bring them back, there is no room for them to survive today, as a result, they can not mate and proliferate. Besides, they claim that this is hopeless to save the weak species, they would not adapt to climate change, unless these species themself can continue their life. Eventually, what belongs to nature is out of human beings league.
On the other hand, we can not leave things like that to go on. First of all, governments around the world should gather together to prevent unsustainable logging, which might lead to deforestation. Not only it is the main cause behind the disappearing of some species but also jeopardizes the survival of human beings themself. Besides, some strict laws should be imposed by authorities to alleviate the negative impact of wildlife hunting. Afforestation should be encouraged, which means planting trees where there was none before. For example, many forests have been saved in Viet Nam due to the encouragement of Uncle Ho, who famous for his campaign: " Spring is planting tree holidays".
To sum up, I admit that human beings have their all limits and restrictions, therefore some natural disasters are out of their control. But I strongly argue that by some appropriate solutions, determination, and persistence, we not only could save other species across the globe but also save ourselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have their all limits and restrictions, therefore some natural disasters are out...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, therefore, for example, such as, as a result, first of all, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20249221184 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85154806469 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610591900312 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9711935027 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256378956368 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788330047245 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578410978723 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152150632333 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583427182974 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.