Crime rate is decreasing compared to the past due to the advance in technology as it can prevent and solve the crime. do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the advancements in technology has reduced and solved the number of crimes from the past. this essay completely agrees with this statement because it is not easy for criminals to run away and evidence of crime is always available.
Criminals find it harder to hide after committing crime. This is because they can be traced through their mobile phones and laptops. The idea of putting a Global Positioning System chip in devices like mobiles, cars, wrist watches and computers has made it easier to locate user's location. For example, according to a survey conducted last year by the Capital City Police, Islamabad, more than half of the criminals in their custody were caught by tracking their mobile phones and other electronic devices.
The proof of crime is easily available as compared to hte past. CCTV cameras are installed in many areas. As a result, the video recording is available with the security agencies installing it and with the property owners and can be easily accessed. Due to this fact, criminals try to keep theirselves out of trouble and rate of crimes tend to reduce. For instance, Mashriq Newspaper reported that crime rate in Karachi in 2016 decreased to 40 percent of the previous figure after video cameras were installed in homes, shopping malls, parking lots and on the road sides.
To conclude, advancing technology prevents and lowers down the number of felonies and thefts because of the fact that everyone's location is being constantly recorded and most of the places are equipped with the video recording devices.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ved the number of crimes from the past. this essay completely agrees with this state...
^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
... down the number of felonies and thefts because of the fact that everyones location is being constantly ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03831417625 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53253516943 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2668049791 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.583333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257346427087 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944010940344 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931420010311 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142280574738 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083358265166 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.