Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places and how to increase its popularity?
Although riding is increasingly become friendly to the environment than other means of transport, this trend is not too popular in many areas. There are some effective solutions to tackle this problem.
Cycling is not often considered a good option because of several reasons. Firstly, it takes much greater amount of time than other forms of transport such as motorbike and bus. For example, if you commute to work by bicycle every day, you would need to get up earlier than those who use their private cars. Therefore, it is more convenient for people using various transport types instead of bikes which usually have a slow speed. Secondly, bicycles are not suitable for travellers to visit many other places far away from their home. This can be explained due to its drawbacks such as a lack of space to bring people’s gadget along when travelling or being affected by bad weather.
Some measures need to be adopted in order to make cycling more poplar for people. The first one is that citizens should be provided sufficient knowledge of riding’s benefits through variety of official media. For instance, riding helps them to improve their overall fitness level if this activity is maintained regularly. Also, people are less likely to have to face the risks of serious accidents by using bikes rather than most vehicles such as cars and buses. Finally, governments and locals should encourage individuals to use bicycles whenever they can, this would lead to a reduction of exhausted fumes and air pollution caused by other heavy means of transport.
In conclusion, it is true that cycling still has a few disadvantages over its advantages. This tendency can be a more popular trend when people realize its obvious benefits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0553633218 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63588795612 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647058823529 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0829907605 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246362531687 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751678481772 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804566820914 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161387948313 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643380874453 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.