Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity?
Nowadays, there have been some arguments that environmentally friendly transport such as cycling should prevail instead of those generating detrimental emissions. However, it could not become globally dominant accounted for its pace and the government should hold this responsibility.
Admittedly, the dominance of bicycles has been hampered in many countries due to several reasons. Firstly, people would spend more time on commuting due to its low pace. In fact, the labor force has more concern about the commuting time since the urbanization plans obligate them to locate further from the work places. Thus, they may prefer using cars or trains than cycling which operates in higher speed, reducing the number of its users on a regular basis. Furthermore, this activity also consumes a lot of energy during participation so it leads to the loss of physical stamina and concentration for users, causing the reduction of work efficiency during the work shift.
Indeed, there are many solutions to increase the number of people using it. Firstly, the government should play an essential role in increasing its popularity. Thanks to the innovation in traffic systems, users can have less intimidation to cars and trucks during traveling since they have their own free lanes to ride, ensuring their safety and reducing the possibility of collision and accidents. Besides, some cycling competitions may encourage residents to engage in practicing it, facilitating its habit within communities. To illustrate, in Taiwan, there are many public bicycles for everyone to hire and ride since authorities desire to enhance people’s fitness and endurance and mitigate the air pollution
In conclusion, although this activity is eco-friendly since it generates no detrimental emission to the environment, but its speed could be a huge drawback to widespread this transport. Therefore, the government should implement some urgent measures to support it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52173913043 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96396556818 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632107023411 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.0005772818 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183449198403 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664850960312 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448126840386 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110181260285 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102906440096 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.