Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can its popularity be increased?
With the development of the automobile field, the declining popularity of cycling has become a major concern in today’s world, especially regarding health problems and the environment. This phenomenon could be ascribed to several underlying explanations and some measures could be utilized to promote the usage of bicycles.
There are several reasons why cycling is not popular in the developed technology era. Firstly, due to the explosion of the automobile industry with modern, full of facilities and faster vehicles like cars, and buses. This growth meets all customers' needs these days. For example, riding a bike for a long trip is not possible but cars or planes make our lives easier. In addition, the lack of separate lanes and paths creates more risks of road collisions. Therefore, it inadvertently puts pressure and fear on citizens and lets them fall into a sedentary lifestyle, overusing automobile vehicles.
Several measures could be adopted to encourage the use of this
environmentally friendly vehicle. The first reason is that companies or schools should create monthly campaigns " A day only use bike" and require everybody to cycle to work. As a result, people can get into the habit of using bikes to improve their health, and also cut out the expense of non-renewable fossil fuels. Moreover, the authority should allocate more money for the construction of cycling paths and lanes for citizens. Once a network of cycling lanes is well-developed, people might choose a bicycle as a preferred form of transport.
In conclusion, the unpopularity of bicycles may result from several reasons. It is predicted that unless these remedies are implemented, the problems associated with using fewer bicycles will continue to persist in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33451957295 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92789363498 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644128113879 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1866770671 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163891679753 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049390652191 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573092155537 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741950480164 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049537413653 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.