Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity?

Essay topics:

Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity?

Many types of transport facilities are available in modern world, among that cycling is one of the good choice for echo friendly form. While, it is not familiar in globally, because of its time consuming and prestige issue. Whereas, there have been many ways to enhance the popularity such as, health awareness and pollution related lectures to the community which is less users.

Nowadays, peoples are less patience and intended to consume their time in different aspects. Owing to the fact of speed problems many of the peoples are less interested to use of cycle. In other words, Other vehicle such as car, bus,train would be a good form of transport those who are urgent to reach a destination or long distance workers. Furthermore, peoples wants to show up their status in the public by means of vehicle they are using. For instance, celebrities or politician's are most likely to exaggerate their esteemed position into the form of luxury car and so on. Thereby peoples have had a thinking related to the prestige has included as per the vehicle they have. So that most of them are avoiding cycle in the form of transport even if it is an environmentally friendly

Nevertheless, encouraging the people regarding the health benefits of cycle usage and its virtue to the environment would make a huge difference inside the society. Having said that, many health issues namely, diabetics, cholesterol, are often reduce by the exercise like cycling in contrast to the jogging and excessive usage of machine like vibration machines. In addition, environmental hazards like global warming, acid rain, other pollution are the result of excessive use of oil vehicles. To give awareness regards to such problems might be insist society to reduce such transport facilities and instead of that they would have been the friends of cycle.

In conclusion, although, cycling is a best form of transport by the way of echo friendly and by the terms of health benefits, peoples are eager to use other forms of transport services for their purposes. Instruct them about the positive impacts of the cycling would likely to have a difference in peoples mind.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun users is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ated lectures to the community which is less users. Nowadays, peoples are less pa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , train
...er words, Other vehicle such as car, bus,train would be a good form of transport those...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly friendly Nevertheless, encouraging the people regarding the health benefits...
^^
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... In conclusion, although, cycling is a best form of transport by the way of ec...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, by the way, in contrast to, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01396648045 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69432630052 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519553072626 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5265606719 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231439284429 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717199777881 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641353010387 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152998429312 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352033286084 0.056905535591 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.