Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems. What are the problems? What are the solutions?
There is no doubt that bicyclists and car drivers travelling together in the same lane should not cause trouble. This situation is understandable, and measures could certainly be taken to tackle the problems. In this essay, I will outline several reasons for this and put forward some feasible measures to address this issue.
We should know that if bicycles and motorcycles share the same lane while travelling, this will definitely cause these two main problems. First of all, accidents involving these two vehicles are inevitable. The rate of mortality for cyclists and motorbikes on the same road is higher than when they have their own lane. Bicycles are always the smallest and slowest means of transport, but cars or motorbikes move extremely quickly, and they are a lot bigger in size, so they will definitely have blind spots. So if the small bicycles are located in the blind spots, then tragic accidents will happen for sure. Secondly, if those vehicles meet a cyclist going in the opposite direction, the big vehicles will not brake in time, and the collision will definitely take place.
In order to deal with these problems, there has to be a way to tackle them. Firstly, limit the speed of traffic if they must share the same lane, and severely fine the vehicles that exceed the allowed speed. Second, if the road is wide enough, the government should divide the lanes for different vehicles to travel.
In conclusion, there are main contributors to the problem of bicyclists and car drivers travelling together at the same time, and several measures are suggested to put an end to the situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: bigger
...e extremely quickly, and they are a lot bigger in size, so they will definitely have blind spo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, as to, in conclusion, no doubt, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95955882353 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58890104656 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547794117647 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1321006598 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.769230769 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162314425336 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546771108131 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579053699364 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102033139084 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039370186776 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.